-1 as people/players will also have problems with damaging players who would have pedestrian animations on them aka ped.ifp.
Rather controlling ped anims , control yourself for these stupid reckless topic suggestions.
First off, you reason is weak as you didnt provide any examples or arguments to prove your point that this will give advantage to players using animations. if we have to go with your reasoning, we should remove other anims like "/rollfall", which is used by some players to avoid certain situations like being under spray effect. meanwhile, in other servers,PARTICULARLY LSSW which is a GANGWAR server, has this feature, and it doesnt effect anyone but the player that uses it, which he can only walk and he is prohibited to shoot with guns while under such animations.if he shoots, his pedmoving style will be disabled. Secondly, rather than addressing the player that gave the suggestion and show your hate towards them just because probably they rekt you in-game or your stupid attitude is just like that, focus on the suggestion and give true arguments against it, I have seen players like lohit who design diagrams,record videos and screenshots to enforce their point of vue.
Julie, I already suggested this back in 2019. There are many suggestions that got alot of positive votes but still did not get implemented.
First off Mr.Genius , She is stating that pedestrian animation
mods should be available at a point and guess what? You're right ,
you should focus on the suggestion and try to understand that she is at more appreciative in mod pedestrian cycles rather than commanded ones.
Second of all, ped.ifp which she is stating is only acceptable in freeroam servers as on which player it is implemented on he/she is hard to damage and also he/she technically can't give damage without shooting at the invisible original physic line. Believe me, I got banned from a DM server on which I was testing a really cool ped.ifp and the reason was ; damage hacks , I wasn't even using them it was just because of ped.ifp's doings.
Third off, I am not having a stupid altitude.
I just wanted to state with a reason that these suggestions would not get implemented so don't create useless topics on them. And if your stupid enough , which you are, why did you gave this suggestion a hand when your suggestion didn't get implemented , which even had positive votes, and this suggestion got no votes why do you think this time will be a different and suggestion will get implemented , which will not (won't).
Just before you start that "tHiS iSn'T A dM sErVeR" be in notice that 'TDM' contains 'DM'.
-1 as people/players will also have problems with damaging players who would have pedestrian animations on them aka ped.ifp.
Rather controlling ped anims , control yourself for these stupid reckless topic suggestions.
Are you kidding me? its actually easy to kill who is using that ped animation.
No , it isn't.
