Plan B
General => General Discussion => Topic started by: flabed9 on June 04, 2018, 03:47:49 am
-
Unfortunately, PlanB is dying. I want to play, but I can't. There's only 1 player. I think the serv needs more updates. New classes, new missions, new maps... I beg you guys... Save my serv...
HostName: Plan B: Protect The President
Address: 37.187.196.107:7777
Players: 1 / 90
Ping: 253
Mode: Protect The President
Language: English
-
Plan B server at this time has less players But if play around after 5 hours you will always see 20-40 players in game. But i also think PTP need some updates.
-
Plan B server at this time has less players But if play around after 5 hours you will always see 20-40 players in game. But i also think PTP need some updates.
Yesterday, I saw 18-20 players online at this time.
-
Nothing to worry about death of ptp as its impossible but i do agree on updating the game mode my any means.
-
Changing the game mode will effect it even more deeply. PTP is one of the famous server because of its game mode that is very simple, easy to understand and enjoyable. And about the player count thing, it is also very simple as the different time zones interrupts it, However, you will always find above 25 players at night.
-
PTP never dies,but I think it's time for a new update
-
This Server will never die I can assure you that, but I do agree that it is time to make a huge update. The last update I know was last february in which the Spree was removed and that was not really a big deal for me. I know Jonne has a great plan. We'll just wait for it.
-
We need proper administration and fail proof rules
-
Can we have more maps? Custom made maps rather than using pre-mapped cities.
-
Unfortunately, PlanB is dying. I want to play, but I can't. There's only 1 player. I think the serv needs more updates. New classes, new missions, new maps... I beg you guys... Save my serv...
HostName: Plan B: Protect The President
Address: 37.187.196.107:7777
Players: 1 / 90
Ping: 253
Mode: Protect The President
Language: English
Most updates can be found here. (https://planbserver.com/forum/index.php?board=3.0)
-
I don't think PlanB is dying. And I don't think that some new major update is badly needed at this time. For me new updates makes things more complex for the beginners.
I like updates tho. ;D
-
Well some the bhais including me were busy with some college stuff, you'll see more active players from this week.
-
Well some the bhais including me were busy with some college stuff, you'll see more active players from this week.
Good to know that.
-
Samp is dying (?)
Well some the bhais including me were busy with some college stuff, you'll see more active players from this week.
Nahi milega :)
-
Samp is dying (?)
Well some the bhais including me were busy with some college stuff, you'll see more active players from this week.
Nahi milega :)
Hawas>PTP
-
It's 2018 mate.. Why are you guys playing This game still?
-
It's 2018 mate.. Why are you guys playing This game still?
then why you're replying in this?
-
Wondering that for 7 years. All great servers had big updates but this one,never lol.
-
This Server will never die I can assure you that, but I do agree that it is time to make a huge update. The last update I know was last february in which the Spree was removed and that was not really a big deal for me. I know Jonne has a great plan. We'll just wait for it.
Yes exactly, but we need patience
-
Wondering that for 7 years. All great servers had big updates but this one,never lol.
Seriously O.o UIF Has like 140 updates,LVP like 13000 or something and LW 20000 or something like that wow O.o
-
Wondering that for 7 years. All great servers had big updates but this one,never lol.
It's not fair to claim that this server is what it was 7 years ago if you ask me.
-
samp is dying,in general
-
Its summer people are on holiday
-
Use this section of the forums to suggest things you think will save PTP from Dying.
https://planbserver.com/forum/index.php?board=3.0
-
Unfortunately, PlanB is dying.
(http://www.img.tpx.cz/uploads/giphy.gif.cf-2.gif)
-
Unfortunately, PlanB is dying.
(http://www.img.tpx.cz/uploads/giphy.gif.cf-2.gif)
(https://i.imgur.com/2iDqSW2.png)
-
Server will probably die with the disrespect towards older players. Sad to see vs what this was 2 years ago.
-
yeah players are low and i needs update though +1
-
+0
-
+1
-
People stopped playing samp lol
It’s not ptp dying, it’s samp dying.
-
Agreed!!... when i was totally newbie in samp there are many players 40,50 players plays daily on ptp but now :'( there are very less players
-
Check out the recent updates here: https://planbserver.com/forum/index.php?topic=4076.0 (https://planbserver.com/forum/index.php?topic=4076.0)
-
everthing have his end So just wait it !
-
We need an update, its called remove civilian class?
(https://i.imgur.com/2KpU7aK.png)
(https://i.giphy.com/media/OWpMbuG5W4r4Y/giphy.webp)
I wont post the screen where 35 players were connected and 28 were civilians, ( no event)
-
We need an update, its called remove civilian class?
(https://i.imgur.com/2KpU7aK.png)
(https://i.giphy.com/media/OWpMbuG5W4r4Y/giphy.webp)
I wont post the screen where 35 players were connected and 28 were civilians, ( no event)
lel
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
lol really, out of all you blame maps of all things?
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
lol really, out of all you blame maps of all things?
Look at statistics and you will see, that amount of AFKers(civils) on different maps is different.
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
lol really, out of all you blame maps of all things?
Look at statistics and you will see, that amount of AFKers(civils) on different maps is different.
Maps shouldn't be blamed for player and clan/regular hive centered reason.
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
lol really, out of all you blame maps of all things?
Look at statistics and you will see, that amount of AFKers(civils) on different maps is different.
Maps shouldn't be blamed for player and clan/regular hive centered reason.
Statistic has nothing to do with blames. It is only about numbers, numbers of ptpers who do not want to ply certain maps.
-
More like "remove shitty maps".
lol really, out of all you blame maps of all things?
Look at statistics and you will see, that amount of AFKers(civils) on different maps is different.
Maps shouldn't be blamed for player and clan/regular hive centered reason.
Statistic has nothing to do with blames. It is only about numbers, numbers of ptpers who do not want to ply certain maps.
Statistics is a bad example if you don't consider all the data lol. The map part only comes into play in NSA and where people can't Snipe good enough or get rekt when the sniper or zerg rush hits them back.
Map shouldn't be removed if the mentality of not playing is revolved more around main armor camping w/ snipo and lack of associates. Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
-
Statistics is a bad example if you don't consider all the data lol. The map part only comes into play in NSA and where people can't Snipe good enough or get rekt when the sniper or zerg rush hits them back.
Map shouldn't be removed if the mentality of not playing is revolved more around main armor camping w/ snipo and lack of associates. Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
NSA is not the only map. And it is not only about regulars. It is about a maps which can not be a decent "playground" for low amount of players. There are 3 maps - ls,sf,lv - which are good for plying even if there are 5 players online. Other maps completely SUCKS. This is a old "fact", you can search about this fact on forums. Most comfortble place is a "city map with fast vehicles". Because you even can play 1 terror vs 1 president on it. Would you like to play 1 v 1 on Red Country map?
I did not say that some maps must be deleted. What i am saying - there are reasons why some map sucks and other don't.
-
Statistics is a bad example if you don't consider all the data lol. The map part only comes into play in NSA and where people can't Snipe good enough or get rekt when the sniper or zerg rush hits them back.
Map shouldn't be removed if the mentality of not playing is revolved more around main armor camping w/ snipo and lack of associates. Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
NSA is not the only map. And it is not only about regulars. It is about a maps which can not be a decent "playground" for low amount of players. There are 3 maps - ls,sf,lv - which are good for plying even if there are 5 players online. Other maps completely SUCKS. This is a old "fact", you can search about this fact on forums. Most comfortble place is a "city map with fast vehicles". Because you even can play 1 terror vs 1 president on it. Would you like to play 1 v 1 on Red Country map?
I did not say that some maps must be deleted. What i am saying - there are reasons why some map sucks and other don't.
NSA is major because that map is gameplay-designed,suggested,updated badly -2 suggestions one being Cobra's Hydra Spawns and other being the Anti-Car Abuse at Area entrance which was mostly unfair for WV anyways.
I can see your point there. Low Player counts are unbalanced mostly, I agree. And one can simply Cruise with a fast car with 2-3 security on his back. Unless plane is counted which due to low player count would feel awfully big and slow gameplay overall. This ofc I say with the avg situation of a 5 player GM, with 70% newbs and 20% regulars.
But to use a 5 player GM as a justification to disregard the average 18-20 player situation is ignorant lol. Low player count GM has a lot of flaws that go missing in the average situation.
I get the part, that is the Gameplay of certain people from certain gameplay time and yes, I agree and support that low player GM should be given attention to too.
-
Statistics is a bad example if you don't consider all the data lol. The map part only comes into play in NSA and where people can't Snipe good enough or get rekt when the sniper or zerg rush hits them back.
Map shouldn't be removed if the mentality of not playing is revolved more around main armor camping w/ snipo and lack of associates. Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
NSA is not the only map. And it is not only about regulars. It is about a maps which can not be a decent "playground" for low amount of players. There are 3 maps - ls,sf,lv - which are good for plying even if there are 5 players online. Other maps completely SUCKS. This is a old "fact", you can search about this fact on forums. Most comfortble place is a "city map with fast vehicles". Because you even can play 1 terror vs 1 president on it. Would you like to play 1 v 1 on Red Country map?
I did not say that some maps must be deleted. What i am saying - there are reasons why some map sucks and other don't.
NSA is major because that map is gameplay-designed,suggested,updated badly -2 suggestions one being Cobra's Hydra Spawns and other being the Anti-Car Abuse at Area entrance which was mostly unfair for WV anyways.
I can see your point there. Low Player counts are unbalanced mostly, I agree. And one can simply Cruise with a fast car with 2-3 security on his back. Unless plane is counted which due to low player count would feel awfully big and slow gameplay overall. This ofc I say with the avg situation of a 5 player GM, with 70% newbs and 20% regulars.
But to use a 5 player GM as a justification to disregard the average 18-20 player situation is ignorant lol. Low player count GM has a lot of flaws that go missing in the average situation.
I get the part, that is the Gameplay of certain people from certain gameplay time and yes, I agree and support that low player GM should be given attention to too.
Can be there a way not to load Big map such as NSA while playercount is less than 15?
-
Statistics is a bad example if you don't consider all the data lol. The map part only comes into play in NSA and where people can't Snipe good enough or get rekt when the sniper or zerg rush hits them back.
Map shouldn't be removed if the mentality of not playing is revolved more around main armor camping w/ snipo and lack of associates. Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
NSA is not the only map. And it is not only about regulars. It is about a maps which can not be a decent "playground" for low amount of players. There are 3 maps - ls,sf,lv - which are good for plying even if there are 5 players online. Other maps completely SUCKS. This is a old "fact", you can search about this fact on forums. Most comfortble place is a "city map with fast vehicles". Because you even can play 1 terror vs 1 president on it. Would you like to play 1 v 1 on Red Country map?
I did not say that some maps must be deleted. What i am saying - there are reasons why some map sucks and other don't.
NSA is major because that map is gameplay-designed,suggested,updated badly -2 suggestions one being Cobra's Hydra Spawns and other being the Anti-Car Abuse at Area entrance which was mostly unfair for WV anyways.
I can see your point there. Low Player counts are unbalanced mostly, I agree. And one can simply Cruise with a fast car with 2-3 security on his back. Unless plane is counted which due to low player count would feel awfully big and slow gameplay overall. This ofc I say with the avg situation of a 5 player GM, with 70% newbs and 20% regulars.
But to use a 5 player GM as a justification to disregard the average 18-20 player situation is ignorant lol. Low player count GM has a lot of flaws that go missing in the average situation.
I get the part, that is the Gameplay of certain people from certain gameplay time and yes, I agree and support that low player GM should be given attention to too.
Can be there a way not to load Big map such as NSA while playercount is less than 15?
There should be tbh, but ofc it's better to get the opinions of those who know the server scripting. @Jonne @Admins
-
We need an update, its called remove civilian class?
(https://i.imgur.com/2KpU7aK.png)
(https://i.giphy.com/media/OWpMbuG5W4r4Y/giphy.webp)
I wont post the screen where 35 players were connected and 28 were civilians, ( no event)
...or at least limit it.
Don't forget a civilian sniper is as good as any GM class beyond mid range, people will stop going civilian if Sniper was nerfed enough.
I agree.
NSA is not the only map. And it is not only about regulars. It is about a maps which can not be a decent "playground" for low amount of players. There are 3 maps - ls,sf,lv - which are good for plying even if there are 5 players online. Other maps completely SUCKS. This is a old "fact", you can search about this fact on forums. Most comfortble place is a "city map with fast vehicles". Because you even can play 1 terror vs 1 president on it. Would you like to play 1 v 1 on Red Country map?
I did not say that some maps must be deleted. What i am saying - there are reasons why some map sucks and other don't.
You're right; but then people will still completely ignore the game mode at double-digit player counts just because they'd rather be sniping new players who were previously enjoying the game or playing Red vs. Blue at the armor spawns (make people lose health when they camp at armor).