Plan B
General => Suggestions => Closed => Topic started by: vento_aureo on December 24, 2017, 10:37:46 pm
-
do it you wont ,': )
and while youre at it maybe add some maps like "south los santos" or maybe "west san fierro" with hydras in them?
-
Andromada is too big for these maps. Not required.
About maps, not sure if more are needed right now.
-1
-
Andromada is too big for these maps. Not required.
About maps, not sure if more are needed right now.
-1
sometimes i like going as civ and roam around with the andromada, the plane itself isnt necessary and it certainly is big for lv too but it would be a nice addition to the other maps imo
-
I can't find a good reason to add Andromeda. The maps you mentioned doesn't have any other good spot to land the Andromeda except the airport. Moreover, the buildings there doesn't have a good distance from each other so if it gets crashed, it can make a large explosion and other players might get disturbed of it.
If you want to roam, Rustler is the best aircraft through which you can make some kills too. With Andromeda it will be a bit hard to make turns.. -1
-
as i said, it already is available on the lv map, which is smaller than the ls map. there is enough room at the end of the runway, nobody gets disturbed by crashes in lv and the buildings are well spaced, not counting the very central downtown area which makes only about 15% of the ls city map
and of course theres no importance to adding this other than decoration and for fun.
-
+1, If you can't land an andromada on a building, you're a terrible pilot. Leave it to the pros.
The maps you mentioned doesn't have any other good spot to land the Andromeda except the airport.
SF: the freeway, aircraft carrier, the naval base roof, esplande, corvin stadium, ocean flats and all the buildings with flat roofs.
LS: maze bank, verdant bluffs, credit and commerce bank of san andreas, rodeo hotel, all the empty land in vinewood, east beach(playa del seville), marina pier (and beach), verona pier and many many many places where you can land the andromada.
-
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
-
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
as I said before, its not like ls and sf are full of supertall skyscrapers for gods sake can someone actually make a worthy attempt at justifying downvoting this idea
should i mention again that neither this idea nor the lv andromada were necessary, only for fun and decoration?
-
+1
It's best plane for doing kamekazi on heavily guarded presidents in the map.
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
So no need -1
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
Not all the taxiways are blocked.
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?
I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.
-
im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.
-
im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.
Wtf lol I don't even know who the hell are you.. Also please don't suggest a suggestion if you can't accept opposite ideas.
Yeah I'm still behind my idea which is about skyscrapers based on cities. Andromada is too big for to use in SF & LS but it's not my fucking whole life to make me busy for disagree with kurt cobain (lel) just add it if the majority wants it.
I'm cool if it gets added. Not needed for server (in my opinion).
-
I don't think adding a vehicle will do any harm plus it would be fun to try to land on places like Military ship etc.
I don't think andromada were added in LV for any particular reason..
+1
im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.
lol you for real... ?
-
im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.
Wtf lol I don't even know who the hell are you.. Also please don't suggest a suggestion if you can't accept opposite ideas.
Yeah I'm still behind my idea which is about skyscrapers based on cities. Andromada is too big for to use in SF & LS but it's not my fucking whole life to make me busy for disagree with kurt cobain (lel) just add it if the majority wants it.
I'm cool if it gets added. Not needed for server (in my opinion).
I accept opposite ideas, I just cant take it when people repeat arguments which ive addressed before.
the "something against me" part was sarcasm by the way
-
I accept opposite ideas, I just cant take it when people repeat arguments which ive addressed before.
Careful, pretty soon people will accuse you of "writing essays".
I see no reason why this can't be added.
... can someone actually make a worthy attempt at justifying downvoting this idea
...What the fuck is this crap about explosions being "disturbing", buildings, and places to land?
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
Not all the taxiways are blocked.
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?
I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.
oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
Not all the taxiways are blocked.
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?
I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.
oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao
Can you please take your head out of your ass and maybe think at least? He never claimed you're a bad pilot, he just assumed you are because you said the andromada can't take off from lsa or sfa when that's clearly not the case. Nobody cares about your gta v skills when the flying system there is light years better than sa's. But I digress and you do too, maybe bring something to the discussion instead of getting defensive about your fragile "muh piloting skillz cx"?
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
Not all the taxiways are blocked.
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw
Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1
Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?
I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.
oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao
Can you please take your head out of your ass and maybe think at least? He never claimed you're a bad pilot, he just assumed you are because you said the andromada can't take off from lsa or sfa when that's clearly not the case. Nobody cares about your gta v skills when the flying system there is light years better than sa's. But I digress and you do too, maybe bring something to the discussion instead of getting defensive about your fragile "muh piloting skillz cx"?
Sorry asshole but i dom't want any asslicker on this suggestion.I already posted my idea about this guy's suggestion but some kiddos like you and the suggestioner can't stand Negetive votes.Then you'd better shut the fuck up and let other's vote.
Absolutely my flying skills are better than you and some others think i can't I'm just thinking none of people like you can play with my pc system or not.Damn your parents didn't teach you anythink about respecting people's ideas
-
-1
-
snippety snip
ironic youre talking about respecting peoples ideas when you didn't even think about mine and claimed it's impossible to take off an andromada from lsa
seems this topic isn't going in a pretty direction, ill cease posting here and suggest you do the same
have a nice day :^)
-
Why not? As long as there's space in those airports
About the new maps, hell no, I'm even for removing some of the existing ones :D
-
Yes,i do like to drive it when i'm bored. As long as there is space or where plane can be landed withoit disturbing people,why not.
-
This is why I want Andromeda on every city map! For practicing my "others gameplay rekting" skill ( ye I was going to kamekazi them but this happened :) )
-
Yes why not. if ppl have fun with it +1
-
Sounds good.+1.
-
Personally,i don't think that this is a solution of making the gamemode more fun,or make it even better,so -1
-
-1
-
is good for boring moments or to crash hydras
+1
-
Some civs use it to disturb original gameplay so -1
-
Some civs use it to disturb original gameplay so -1
Isn't that what most people do anyway? Civs can choose what side to play on so there's no "original gameplay" for them.
-
+1
-
-1 not liked
-
Bump!
Btw last night I used that plane to do kamekazis on main armor. So that's gold!
-
+1
-
I can't find a good reason to add Andromeda. The maps you mentioned doesn't have any other good spot to land the Andromeda except the airport. Moreover, the buildings there doesn't have a good distance from each other so if it gets crashed, it can make a large explosion and other players might get disturbed of it.
If you want to roam, Rustler is the best aircraft through which you can make some kills too. With Andromeda it will be a bit hard to make turns.. -1
-
I can't land andromada and its hard to make turn to buildings
I have provided TimeStamps use them, and sorry for the FPS in advance(play it at x1.25 speed if it's too slow), video is quite old.
All of this is done with '0 Flying Skill Stats' with almost everything done on my very first attempt ingame (not cut content of me failing prior to this, this all done in very 1st run).
Not mention I am not even a notably good Andromada pilot, good pilots can easily use this plane to it's true potential.
Ingame you get 100 percent Flying Stats which makes takeoff,landing and everything flying much easier.
-
+1
-
+1
-
+99
-
Bumping old topics.
-
In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
So no need -1
-
I think it's good to just keep this to 1 map. We have it in LV, so I don't see the need for it to add it to the other maps as well.