add andromadas to ls and sf too

[YoMama]

I accept opposite ideas, I just cant take it when people repeat arguments which ive addressed before.

Careful, pretty soon people will accuse you of "writing essays".

I see no reason why this can't be added.

... can someone actually make a worthy attempt at justifying downvoting this idea

...What the fuck is this crap about explosions being "disturbing", buildings, and places to land?

[Madman]

In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway

Not all the taxiways are blocked.

In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land

No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?

I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.

 

oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao

[vento_aureo]

In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway

Not all the taxiways are blocked.

In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land

No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?

I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.

 

oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao

 

Can you please take your head out of your ass and maybe think at least? He never claimed you're a bad pilot, he just assumed you are because you said the andromada can't take off from lsa or sfa when that's clearly not the case. Nobody cares about your gta v skills when the flying system there is light years better than sa's. But I digress and you do too, maybe bring something to the discussion instead of getting defensive about your fragile "muh piloting skillz cx"?

[Madman]

In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway

Not all the taxiways are blocked.

In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land

No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?

I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.

 

oh with that fucking video you wanna tell me that i can't fly andromada?!lemme tell you sth if you can land a Cargoplane in gta 5 in lsia and in an airport in grand senora desert in gta 5 then call me a bad pilot.Lol first time an idiot tell me that i can't fly a rustler lmao

 

Can you please take your head out of your ass and maybe think at least? He never claimed you're a bad pilot, he just assumed you are because you said the andromada can't take off from lsa or sfa when that's clearly not the case. Nobody cares about your gta v skills when the flying system there is light years better than sa's. But I digress and you do too, maybe bring something to the discussion instead of getting defensive about your fragile "muh piloting skillz cx"?

Sorry asshole but i dom't want any asslicker on this suggestion.I already posted my idea about this guy's suggestion but some kiddos like you and the suggestioner can't stand Negetive votes.Then you'd better shut the fuck up and let other's vote.
Absolutely my flying skills are better than you and some others think i can't I'm just thinking none of people like you can play with my pc system or not.Damn your parents didn't teach you anythink about respecting people's ideas

[Hito]

-1

[vento_aureo]

snippety snip

ironic youre talking about respecting peoples ideas when you didn't even think about mine and claimed it's impossible to take off an andromada from lsa

seems this topic isn't going in a pretty direction, ill cease posting here and suggest you do the same

have a nice day :^)

[Miau]

Why not? As long as there's space in those airports

About the new maps, hell no, I'm even for removing some of the existing ones

[Crash]

Yes,i do like to drive it when i'm bored. As long as there is space or where plane can be landed withoit disturbing people,why not.

[Shawkhawk did nothing wrong!]

This is why I want Andromeda on every city map! For practicing my "others gameplay rekting" skill ( ye I was going to kamekazi them but this happened )

[ZeRo]

Yes why not. if ppl have fun with it +1

[Freckles]

Sounds good.+1.

[BugsBunny]

Personally,i don't think that this is a solution of making the gamemode more fun,or make it even better,so -1

[Barbarianking]

-1

[Oakley]

is good for boring moments or to crash hydras

+1

[Son_Gun]

Some civs use it to disturb original gameplay so -1