add andromadas to ls and sf too

[vento_aureo]

do it you wont ,': )

and while youre at it maybe add some maps like "south los santos" or maybe "west san fierro" with hydras in them?

[GlennN]

Andromada is too big for these maps. Not required.

About maps, not sure if more are needed right now.

 -1

[vento_aureo]

Andromada is too big for these maps. Not required.

About maps, not sure if more are needed right now.

 -1

sometimes i like going as civ and roam around with the andromada, the plane itself isnt necessary and it certainly is big for lv too but it would be a nice addition to the other maps imo

[Maddy]

I can't find a good reason to add Andromeda. The maps you mentioned doesn't have any other good spot to land the Andromeda except the airport. Moreover, the buildings there doesn't have a good distance from each other so if it gets crashed, it can make a large explosion and other players might get disturbed of it.

If you want to roam, Rustler is the best aircraft through which you can make some kills too. With Andromeda it will be a bit hard to make turns.. -1

[vento_aureo]

as i said, it already is available on the lv map, which is smaller than the ls map. there is enough room at the end of the runway, nobody gets disturbed by crashes in lv and the buildings are well spaced, not counting the very central downtown area which makes only about 15% of the ls city map

and of course theres no importance to adding this other than decoration and for fun.

[Judah]

+1, If you can't land an andromada on a building, you're a terrible pilot. Leave it to the pros.

The maps you mentioned doesn't have any other good spot to land the Andromeda except the airport.

SF:  the freeway, aircraft carrier, the naval base roof, esplande, corvin stadium, ocean flats and all the buildings with flat roofs.
LS: maze bank, verdant bluffs, credit and commerce bank of san andreas, rodeo hotel, all the empty land in vinewood, east beach(playa del seville), marina pier (and beach), verona pier and many many many places where you can land the andromada.

[COBRA]

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

[vento_aureo]

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

as I said before, its not like ls and sf are full of supertall skyscrapers for gods sake can someone actually make a worthy attempt at justifying downvoting this idea

should i mention again that neither this idea nor the lv andromada were necessary, only for fun and decoration?

[Shawkhawk did nothing wrong!]

+1
It's best plane for doing kamekazi on heavily guarded presidents in the map.

[Madman]

In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway
In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land
So no need -1

[Judah]

In SF we already have some rustlers in the runway

Not all the taxiways are blocked.

In LS an Andromada is too big to take off/land

No offence but clearly you're a bad pilot. https://youtu.be/ylrbRm-D6Mw

Andromada is in LV just because of there is no high buildings such as we have in LS and SF. So, players can easily use andromada in LV skies. For that reason, not needed.. -1

Do you realise that most of the tall buildings are concentrated over a small area in both cities (less than 10% of the total area) and that the rest of city is clear?

I don't think the number of buildings(or their height) matter if you know how to fly properly. It's not that hard to fly between buildings or over buildings.

 

[vento_aureo]

im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.

[COBRA]

im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.

Wtf lol I don't even know who the hell are you.. Also please don't suggest a suggestion if you can't accept opposite ideas.

Yeah I'm still behind my idea which is about skyscrapers based on cities. Andromada is too big for to use in SF & LS but it's not my fucking whole life to make me busy for disagree with kurt cobain (lel) just add it if the majority wants it.

I'm cool if it gets added. Not needed for server (in my opinion).

[Vishwas]

I don't think adding a vehicle will do any harm plus it would be fun to try to land on places like Military ship etc.

I don't think andromada were added in LV for any particular reason..

+1

im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.

lol you for real... ?

[vento_aureo]

im just going to assume that anyone who disagrees with shit reasoning either didnt read all the thread replies, is really dumb or just has something against me.

Wtf lol I don't even know who the hell are you.. Also please don't suggest a suggestion if you can't accept opposite ideas.

Yeah I'm still behind my idea which is about skyscrapers based on cities. Andromada is too big for to use in SF & LS but it's not my fucking whole life to make me busy for disagree with kurt cobain (lel) just add it if the majority wants it.

I'm cool if it gets added. Not needed for server (in my opinion).

I accept opposite ideas, I just cant take it when people repeat arguments which ive addressed before.

the "something against me" part was sarcasm by the way