SoLoD the first mistake you ever made is to mark the negative side of a quote and provoke a debate against it,where the judging half of the community doesn't even read your shit and will judge you via status quo.
Second mistake was that ITS A FUCKING ASSASSIN'S GAME QUOTE WHICH IS MEANT TO SOUND WRONG IN A General perspective.
GG no Re plz.
Re: Post the philosophical quotes you like the most.
« Reply #34 on: January 13, 2018, 10:46:53 pm »Sorry for the double post. But my system is acting weird for some reason and not giving out the content that I modified.
If possible please merge this one with that to avoid the doublepost with '//Nanibot: Merging a double
fook u officer skitts jajajajaSo I am making a completely new one instead.
[Please bear my horrible punctuation placements btw]
That doesn't mean I am bandwagoning SoLoD with 2nd wheel pity trope here. I strongly disagree with him on certain points.
Now from the very start.
Also, saying that everything is permitted when in some countries NOT EVERYTHING is permitted... Also, in YOUR country: The new constitution also stipulated that all laws were to conform to the injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Quran and Sunnah. So, are you trying to say that Islam permits everything?
Why in bloody fork,did you just assume that a quote; from a Game about a Creed,that shows it's particular views which is NOT to limited to a religion - is actually meant to be Pro Islam or some shit.
It is meant to induce a ideology of brotherhood and all that "-isms" that I don't know, Ezio who once explained it wasn't a Muslim Lmfao.
Why the bloody fork did you just assume that he agrees with a country and the his ideas 100% correlate with his country? It wasn't meant to sound the way you assumed it to be.
You shot yourself in the foot here by not looking behind a quote's context and then ramming it headon.
Half Baked Knowledge is dangerous my friend.
Nice, quoting a fucking racist and terrorist, who is talking about education, and at the same time the only invention from his educated black friends is to poo to the elevator`s shaft, which were built by white men.
Ok not sure if Sarcasm or something else. Can I get a elaboration to this?
Reply to Saurabh
What the fuck SoLoD. Why are you so aggressively reacting to Saurabh's replies? Ik even I get the feel to counter hard but you nitpicked points back there which you probably knew how it was meant to be justified.
It's not even based on a particular religious shit.
Starting with.
So, are you trying to identify a man as a person with a working brain?
Do you understand that humanisation of today`s world demends from you to respect any life, and your separation of working/not working brain is nothing but a discrimination? Do you think that discrimination is a "philosophical" thing?
Wut?
Respect =/= Blind praising of Mediocracy.
Discrimination is very fundamental thing both philosophically and scientifically.
I am not getting your point here.
Every time i am reading your posts, they are always irrelevant. That is "absolutely true".
Irrelevant Ad Hominem.
What he believes to be true(his religion/faith or anyone else's) is ofc not even close to being what we call a 'truth' or a fact(better word)
Then what is the point in his "faith"? You just said that Deadman is nothing but a hypocrite? Because how can you "beliave" in your religion and AT THE SAME TIME he can not say that this "beliave" is true?
Sorry I didn't understand you here.
This is not how religion "works". Because it IS the absolute true by determination of religion.
If he accepts that there is no absolute true, how can you be sure that your faith is true? You see, you words is nothing but a rubbish. Somehow people thinking that they have a "right" to argue about something they have no idea about.
Absolute Truth =/= Truth
It has a adjective of Absolute to it. And if you find it contradictory, it is under the assumption that he still does believe in his faith creating a juxtaposed situation. Which again cannot be fully proved as the basis to your argument lies includes assumptions.
Somehow people thinking that they have a "right" to argue about something they have no idea about.
Metaphorical Irony Moment.
I don't know crap about the Elon Musk shit so I won't argue about it since most of the arguments is of informational/fact correction dispute than interpretation shiz like here. I will ignore commenting about that because it would be useless. I will do research on it myself and then comment on it.
//Skittles: Merging a double post.