What? I guess before banning a particular player, the evidence is shown to all the admins and only after that a decision is announced. There is no chance of injustice. -1
Well, bro,it gets trickier with aimbots.
Obv admins won't be, and shouldn't be recording the player for proofs but
I think that the player should still be able to know the timestamps of the moment when the ac showed possible aimbot warnings or when the admin found him fishy, so that he can, if he has, provide the videos in his defence.
I'm not sure how long admins observe a player before sharing their views with other admins, but there is still and always will be a chance of error and biasness. A player who has been playing shit for months and suddenly had few 'lucky' shots will obviously bring suspicion and might trigger some ac warnings, but again, idk how exactly the ac working and how fast admins jump to the conclusion. So I'd still like if they can at least give a chance to the player to post his side of gameplay and if he can't he stays banned anyway.
For the ones saying admins aren't biased, I'm sorry humans are always biased. At least admins tend to be the least biased guys in the community and yea i can second that PTP staff is better in ban handling than that in other servers. With the new scripts and all i feel there is almost zero scope of unfair admin involvement, so l don't think it should be a demand to ask for proofs but only a humble request to provide info if the player wants to defend his case in such subjective cases.
