Honestly, it doesn't matter for me how it was in the past. I am struggling to find a way how to leave the class and fully integrate it in the gamemode without screwing up the balance.
This is a curious statement. I just gave you my historical perspective on how the balance was screwed up, but you simultaneously dismiss it and say you're struggling with how to fix it?
Quit with the bullshit. Everyone here knows that securities can easily help a flying president, and you of all people know that a president is far from invincible in a plane. If the securities aren't protecting, that's a separate issue and certainly not limited to planes.
I didn't say that it is limited to planes. But yeah, they rarely keep up.
Then you can't use that an argument against letting the President fly. To do otherwise is dishonest.
Whilst I don't question your personal effort of popularizing rustlers (your signature), how much did it help? I mean, what is the percentage of players affected to your (positive) propaganda? Not too big.
How the hell do you know? I certainly don't pretend to know how many people have taken more of an interest in Rustlers, but I can tell you that I had two people following me around/chatting with me yesterday because of my guide, and I hadn't played in months. I had other questions about planes that I couldn't have dreamed about before the guide. From a cursory look, it's at least one of the most, if not the most-viewed topics on this form that isn't stickied or off-topic. I'm pretty disappointed that you so confidently say something like that with absolutely no evidence to back it up, in spite of obvious and easily-accessible evidence to the contrary.
... the truth is that the amount of players capable of "usually taking out a flying YoMama" is very low.
I hereby define "YoMama's law"-- that any discussion about aircraft in this community will inevitably devolve into people who don't know much about them bringing up good pilots as a (bullshit) counterargument. This is in spite of the fact that bringing them up as counterarguments invalidates their point somewhat-- if their assertion that there are a only few good pilots is true, then it's probably a pretty fair fight for the vast majority of people.
Again, I'm pretty disappointed that you can be so arrogant. You're telling me that you know better than I do how difficult it is for me to survive when flying. Sure, when you've got one person vs someone like me, chances are I will come out on top, but I've written here time and time again that adding just one person against me makes it significantly more difficult for me. When I see two planes coming at me, I get to the ground if my security has been shot down. If you're the President, the whole point is that many people are chasing you at a time-- I don't fly for long, if at all, as President for this reason.
I'm tired of being a broken record here. I've spent more than 10% of my time playing this game successfully surviving as President ((303*.25hr)=75, 75/645 hrs). I've failed as President 300 times, we'll conservatively assume that those runs are 6 minutes long. That means I've spent 105/645 hrs, or around 15% of my time in this game, playing as the President. That's just in this server. You, by contrast, have survived as President 8 times, for two of your 1600 hours; you've died 94 times; using the same assumptions that's 9.4 hours for 11.4 hours of Presidential play in total. That's less than 1% of your total time and a little more than a tenth of the time I've played as President. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that I may have a little more experience playing as President than you do, as well as a lot more flying experience. You certainly have plenty of experience chasing the President, which includes chasing me, but I've always been surprised to see you claiming things that games we've played together usually contradict. My suggestion for you is to find some evidence that you didn't pull out of your ass, then reenter this debate. Better yet, learn to fly better, play as the President more, gain some perspective, then reenter this debate. This world needs less people who expect to be taken seriously simply because they're overconfident, not more of them.